First Edition, January 2017
When referencing this material, please cite:
@article{CHARISDB, author = {Nam Kim, Alex Krasner, Colin Kosinski, Michael Wininger, Maria Qadri, Zachary Kappus, Shabbar Danish, and William Craelius}, title = {Trending autoregulatory indices during treatment for traumatic brain injury}, journal = {Journal of clinical monitoring and computing}, volume = {30}, number = {6}, pages = {821-831}, year = {2016} }
Please also include the standard citation for PhysioNet:
@article{PhysioNet, author = {Goldberger, Ary L. and Amaral, Luis A. N. and Glass, Leon and Hausdorff, Jeffrey M. and Ivanov, Plamen Ch. and Mark, Roger G. and Mietus, Joseph E. and Moody, George B. and Peng, Chung-Kang and Stanley, H. Eugene}, title = {{PhysioBank}, {PhysioToolkit}, and {PhysioNet}: Components of a New Research Resource for Complex Physiologic Signals}, journal = {Circulation}, publisher = {American Heart Association, Inc.}, volume = {101}, number = {23}, year = {2000}, month = {June}, pages = {e215--e220}, doi = {10.1161/01.CIR.101.23.e215}, issn = {0009-7322}, url = {http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/101/23/e215} }
The CHARIS database contains multi-channel recordings of ECG, arterial blood pressure (ABP), and intracranial pressure (ICP) of patients diagnosed with traumatic brain injury (TBI). The data is contributed by members of the CHARIS project which aims to systematize the analysis of relevant physiological signals, and create data-driven algorithms to search for potential predictors of acute clinical events for patients with acute brain injury.
Data Collection
Data acquisition units were connected to patient monitors installed in surgical intensive care unit (SICU) rooms of Robert Wood Johnson Medical Center of Rutgers University, and were activated upon arrival of a patient with diagnosis of brain injury and requiring an ICP bolt/ventriculostomy. In most cases, patients were sedated and ventilated. Arterial blood pressure (ABP) was continuously monitored with an indwelling catheter, and ICP was continuously monitored with either a subarachnoid bolt or ventriculostomy. Elevations of ICP above 20 mmHg were treated with boluses of mannitol and mild hyperventilation.
Signals were acquired from the outputs of clinical monitors routinely employed in the SICU, via isolated and filtered (25 Hz cutoff) outputs from a General Electric TRAM-rac 4A. The sampling rate was 50 Hz with a resolution of 1.41 mV at ±5 V analog input range, which is equivalent to a pressure resolution of 0.14 mmHg and a dynamic range of ±500 mmHg. ICP was continuously monitored with micro transducers (Camino Direct Pressure Monitor, Camino Laboratories, San Diego, CA) that were inserted intra-parenchymally into the frontal cranium. In some patients, ICP was only available intermittently from a ventriculostomy. ABP was registered with a fluid-filled catheter in the radial artery (Arterial Line, Edwards LifeSciences Inc.). For more details, see the referenced paper.
Data Files
The data files are provided in standard WFDB format, numbered by patient number. Additional patient information is contained in the header files.
Contributors
This data was contributed by William Craelius, professor of Biomedical Engineering at Rutgers University. See also the CHARIS-GUI physiotoolkit contribution, an integrated platform for detecting intracranial hypertension events.
Name Last modified Size Description
Parent Directory - RECORDS 2017-01-09 16:21 108 list of record names charis9.hea 2017-01-18 13:31 260 header file charis8.hea 2017-01-18 13:31 179 header file charis7.hea 2017-01-18 13:31 224 header file charis6.hea 2017-01-18 13:31 236 header file charis5.hea 2017-01-18 13:31 240 header file charis4.hea 2017-01-18 13:31 235 header file charis3.hea 2017-01-18 13:31 241 header file charis2.hea 2017-01-18 13:31 243 header file charis13.hea 2017-01-18 13:31 245 header file charis12.hea 2017-01-18 13:31 245 header file charis11.hea 2017-01-18 13:31 237 header file charis10.hea 2017-01-18 13:31 181 header file charis1.hea 2017-01-18 13:31 247 header file charis9.dat 2017-01-18 13:31 176M digitized signal(s) charis8.dat 2017-01-18 13:31 98M digitized signal(s) charis7.dat 2017-01-18 13:31 138M digitized signal(s) charis6.dat 2017-01-18 13:31 47M digitized signal(s) charis5.dat 2017-01-18 13:31 206M digitized signal(s) charis4.dat 2017-01-18 13:31 41M digitized signal(s) charis3.dat 2017-01-18 13:30 98M digitized signal(s) charis2.dat 2017-01-18 13:30 386M digitized signal(s) charis13.dat 2017-01-18 13:30 81M digitized signal(s) charis12.dat 2017-01-18 13:30 118M digitized signal(s) charis11.dat 2017-01-18 13:30 99M digitized signal(s) charis10.dat 2017-01-18 13:30 122M digitized signal(s) charis1.dat 2017-01-18 13:30 70M digitized signal(s) SHA256SUMS 2017-01-30 09:17 2.2K SHA1SUMS 2017-01-30 09:17 1.5K MD5SUMS 2017-01-30 09:17 1.3K DOI 2017-01-23 15:50 20
If you would like help understanding, using, or downloading content, please see our Frequently Asked Questions. If you have any comments, feedback, or particular questions regarding this page, please send them to the webmaster. Comments and issues can also be raised on PhysioNet's GitHub page. Updated Friday, 28 October 2016 at 16:58 EDT |
PhysioNet is supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) and the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB) under NIH grant number 2R01GM104987-09.
|